A flawless stay
We continue to face costly repairs, which
prevented the organization from extending the guarantee period for completion of all activities. It is then that the permanent council of the organizations adopts a new approach: to transfer certain professionals; the team of consultants from the beginning of a new project, so that they themselves manage the project's budget guarantee. In other words, they themselves would suffer the consequences of their design on the guarantee of the council's budget.
As soon as their cautious approach to collaboration disappears, officials begin to tackle the toughest issues head-on.
The resulting innovative solutions enabled the consultant to achieve separability objectives, while meeting other criteria.
Very quickly, the organization faced with these projects will extend the guarantee, eliminating at the same time the small position coordination and unsafe processes.
Reading taught the need to know the result obtained, the team collaborators to increase the resistance to the behavior of each and the motivation of these objectives and challenges. This may lead us to create a new position or change our strategic method to coordinate all decisions related to project preparation with all relevant professionals and branches.
Over time, for the effects of a decision to be felt, it becomes more difficult to hold the decision maker accountable. A lot of the people involved in launching a project were present during a dialogue.
They were aware of the consequences of their actions, the compromise they made or the quality of their collaboration, so that they know that the impact on the future will be able to reach them. The closest this future, more people will be aware of the consequences of their impact more than they show themselves to be able to head their leadership. For example, in the case of several projects or works process, it may be sufficient to significantly reduce the time needed to mature, to increase the consultation process to achieve a productive outcome.
The method is simply to ask the group leaders to delegate their tasks.
As a civil society, we will follow for the proper functioning of the organization, as well as for the continuity of all the projects to be realized. beyond the activities under direct control. By giving them more complex.
In our professional bureaucracy, the inadequacy of the organization and the arbitrariness of the decision constitute the main risk. In the success of the creative organization, the main organizational risk is the over-adaptation of the organization and the flight ahead of the decision. This characterization could be studied in other types of organizations and sets of organizations.
The management activity aims to prevent, mitigate or stop this risk, as well as the case may be. Total abandonment to classic decision-making the theory is rational or considered unrealistic in all cases: the problem must be identified, the necessary information sought, the possible solutions analyzed, the choice and the decision made, and then the chosen solution implemented; practices of many great organizations of our time, especially when the important decision is made, the result of a deliberation is instituted.
In fact, we will resort to the rationality instituted by the organization even if it does not guarantee the rationality of the decision taken. Because rationality is both the product of the think-tank's impact as a socialized process and a production of thought that indeed needs to be conceptually introduce a gap between what is within the scope of the organization, but that could not happen at certain difficult times, and what really happened and it is necessary to introduce managerial thinking essential to the proper functioning organisation.
For all the information on our social work or how to fill out the form to become a member or a social worker for the defense of human rights, do not hesitate to contact on the coordinate email: